Jump to content

anonymous

Uber Member
  • Content count

    1,138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About anonymous

  • Rank
    Servant

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0
  1. In the field of psychology, lostinline's tirades are known as "deflection": a narcissistic tactic to divert attention from the real issue---in lostinline's case, to deflect from the truth concerning the bias/prejudice of molokanism, and her hypocritical claims abusing the name(s) of THE LORD GOD. Like the Democrat upstarts and their absolutely ludicrous moronic narratives, the following foolishness by lostinline, isn't worthy of a response nor the bandwidth, only pity (and prayer for these wayward individuals)---
  2. REPEAT: Again, as is typical for those with lostinline's mindset....NOTHING BUT BASELESS/UNFOUNDED ZERO-SUBSTANCE NONSENSICAL FOOLISHNESS. Pathetic....
  3. And lostinline actually thinks she's taken seriously when she claims this--- ---yet cannot answer the following simple questions: 1. What has THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH---in you---taught you concerning molokanism and its teaching of partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? 2. Based on the truths of SOLA SCRIPTURA, does THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH---in you---approve molokanism’s teaching of partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice toward non-molokans? Yes or no?
  4. And the readers are supposed to believe this--- Yeah, right, uh huh, tell us another tall tale.... You are not a man, nor are you married, nor are you a father of four.
  5. REPEAT: The similarities between individuals with lostinline’s mindset and left-wing liberal Democrats (and their left-wing liberal spokespersons aka the frenzied mass media) are eerily uncanny. Examples--- Brazenly/unscrupulously and incessantly spewing a false narrative despite evidence of indisputable truth. Baseless unfounded with zero-substance rhetoric. Non-apologetic even when proven to be blatantly in error/wrong. Demonstrably exhibiting hypocrisy in its classic self-condemnatory form. ---and is confirmed by lostinline every time she opens her mouth as evidenced in her previous and most recent post(s). Absolutely pitiful…. P.S. REMINDER to lostinline: Taking THE LORD GOD'S name hypocritically and in vain--- last/least/foundinline ©™® (In the name of Yahuwah, Yahushua Hamashiach and Ruach HaKodesh) ---as well as bearing false witness, are serious offenses against ALMIGHTY GOD, and bode serious repercussions.
  6. The one who claims--- ---but refuses to answer two simple questions related to RUACH HAKODESH: ---speaks volumes regarding that person’s claims….
  7. Yet another confirmation of lostinline’s spirit of left-winged liberal Democrats and their frenzied mass media cohorts, who selectively choose to turn a blind eye and deaf ear to the truth, is found in her following statement: The truth of the matter concerning anonymous and the congregation anonymous is a member of, was, in fact, presented in a previous post: But alas, like her left-winged liberal brethren who refuse to hear and see the truth---because of their arrogance and having absolutely NOTHING substantive to respond with---lostinline will continue in the same spirit to spew her baseless nonsensical falsehoods/lies. Pitiful, absolutely pitiful....
  8. The information concerning lostinline in anonymous' post--- ---is confirmed by lostinline every time she opens her mouth as evidenced in her previous and most recent post(s). P.S. REMINDER to lostinline: Taking THE LORD GOD'S name hypocritically and in vain--- last/least/foundinline ©™® (In the name of Yahuwah, Yahushua Hamashiach and Ruach HaKodesh) ---as well as bearing false witness, are serious offenses against ALMIGHTY GOD, and bode serious repercussions.
  9. The similarities between individuals with lostinline’s mindset and left-wing liberal Democrats (and their left-wing liberal spokespersons aka the frenzied mass media) are eerily uncanny. Examples--- Brazenly/unscrupulously and incessantly spewing a false narrative despite evidence of indisputable truth. Baseless unfounded with zero-substance rhetoric. Non-apologetic even when proven to be blatantly in error/wrong. Demonstrably exhibiting hypocrisy in its classic self-condemnatory form. Absolutely pitiful….
  10. “Creepy” doesn’t begin to describe last/least/lostinline’s obsession with anonymous’ identity. Unfortunately for her, like fourvetta/maximist/prigun, last/least/lostinline’s “wires are crossed,” and her wannabe “Sherlock Holmes’” investigatory skills obviously are a hindrance not a help, resembling more the bumbling boob, Inspector Clouseau, than those of a competent investigator. Whomever and wherever last/least/lostinline has/is acquiring her information regarding this anonymous, is off base as seen in her assertions: The disrespect for and breaking of forum rules demonstrated by last/least/lostinline is a telling reflection of her modus operandi in life per se---favoring the “rules are meant to be broken” mantra of lawbreakers/rebels. However, to put this matter to rest, and for the record: Neither was/is this anonymous a widow nor childless---this anonymous was/is married and the parent of three children, all with disabilities, two of whom are severely disabled. So last/least/lostinline can put her little soul and its obsession to rest---and focus on the messages, which is the format of this forum, and not the messenger's identity [with whom last/least/lostinline is obsessed]. But alas, like the Pharisees during JESUS' day, last/least/lostinline is not interested in hearing the truth [via the messages], and actually is doing on this forum to CHRISTians today what the Pharisees did to CHRIST JESUS during HIS day---couldn’t find fault with HIS words and works after many attempts to do so---then shifted to accusing HIM falsely. And why? Simply because HE spoke the truth [concerning their spiritual status] seen in one of many such scenarios: “They answered him, ‘Abraham is our father.’ JESUS said to them, ‘If you were Abraham's children, you would be doing the works Abraham did, but now you seek to kill ME, a MAN WHO has told you the truth that I heard from GOD. This is not what Abraham did. You are doing the works your father did.’ They said to HIM, ‘We were not born of sexual immorality. We have ONE FATHER---even GOD.’ JESUS said to them, ‘If GOD were your FATHER, you would love ME, for I came from GOD and I am here. I came not of MY own accord, but HE sent ME. Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear MY word. You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies. But because I tell the truth, you do not believe ME. Which one of you convicts ME of sin? If I tell the truth, why do you not believe ME? Whoever is of GOD hears the words of GOD. The reason why you do not hear them is that you are not of GOD.’” (John 8:39-47) With the above truthful SCRIPTURAL text in view, let us return to the two questions posed to last/least/lostinline regarding her claim---“….because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul.” If last/least/lostinline truly believes SOLA SCRIPTURA to be the inerrant, infallible word(s) of ALMIGHTY GOD, and if THE HOLY SPIRIT WHO is THE SPIRIT of TRUTH WHO is THE SPIRIT of CHRIST WHO is ALMIGHTY GOD WHO is THE AUTHOR of SOLA SCRIPTURA, actually indwells her heart and soul as she claims---and SOLA SCRIPTURA teaches that THE LORD GOD HIMSELF, THE AUTHOR of SOLA SCRIPTURA, shows no partiality (aka bias/prejudice), and partiality (aka bias/prejudice) is---sin: “So Peter opened his mouth and said: ‘Truly I understand that GOD shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears HIM and does what is right is acceptable to HIM.’” (Acts 10:34-35) “For GOD shows no partiality.” (Romans 2:11) “My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our LORD JESUS CHRIST, THE LORD of glory.” (James 2:1) “But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.” (James 2:9) ---last/least/lostinline, a self-proclaimed “….man (???) of Faith in Yahushua Hamashiach….,” should have no problem whatsoever in answering the two related questions in THE SPIRIT of CHRIST/THE SPIRIT of TRUTH (truthfully/full of truth)/THE HOLY SPIRIT WHOM she claims "....indwells my heart and soul....": 1) What does THE HOLY SPIRIT WHO is THE SPIRIT of CHRIST [JESUS]---in you (your heart and soul)---teach you concerning molokanism’s partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? 2) Does THE HOLY SPIRIT WHO is THE SPIRIT of CHRIST [JESUS]---in you (your heart and soul)---approve [of] molokanism’s partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? So what are your answers, last/least/lostinline? And why do you continue to ignore these questions? Again, the answers are a no-brainer for a bona fide CHRISTian indwelt by THE SPIRIT of CHRIST [JESUS] WHO is THE SPIRIT of TRUTH WHO is THE HOLY SPIRIT--- WHOM last/least/lostinline claims "....indwells my heart and soul." (BTW, there is no difference in believing JESUS’ words when HE spoke (orally) while here on Earth, and believing HIS words documented (written) in SOLA SCRIPTURA post HIS departure---HIS words are one and the same truth---oral and written. In fact/truth, the written words as recorded in SOLA SCRIPTURA, are the oral/spoken words of JESUS.) Speaking to the misperception of on-the-defensive molokans---the crux of the issue is NOT, repeat NOT, [religious/spiritual] community per se, which is a wonderful entity instituted and established by THE LORD GOD HIMSELF. The crux of the issue, whether it be with traditionalists (e.g., molokans, Amish, Mennonites, etc.) and/or cultic fringe groups (e.g., maximisti, Mormons, JWs, raelists, scientologists, etc.), is---denial/rejection of---[the] truth---THE LORD GOD’S truth(s)---period, the end. CHRISTians on this forum who formerly were members of the pseudo-Christian molokan religious community do NOT, repeat, do NOT have an issue with “community” per se---they do have an issue however, with community, especially the religious leadership, that embraces and practices anti-CHRISTian/anti-SCRIPTURAL/un-GODly beliefs such as those communities mentioned above to name a few. For bona fide CHRISTians, the issue has always been---rejection of THE LORD GOD’S truth(s)/word(s) thus rejection of THE LORD GOD HIMSELF. Such was the case from the very beginning, prior to JESUS’ coming, it was the case during HIS day, it is the case now, and it will be the case in the future until HE returns---because bottom line---the [especially, unregenerate] person just does NOT want to hear/know THE CREATOR’S truth(s) and humble himself before the mighty hand of THE LORD in repentance, but would much rather concoct/create/fabricate his own “truth,” and actually believe it (as was the case with humankind’s progenitors in the beginning, and the "old Adams" of today such as last/least/lostinline, et al)---which is nothing short of---idolatry: a figment of the mind; fantasy; a false conception or notion; fallacy. Unfortunately for them, the [molokan] mindset of individuals like last/least/lostinline will never, repeat never, see this unless and until the person accepts conviction of wrongful thinking (and doing, explicitly and/or tacitly) by THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH aka THE SPIRIT of CHRIST aka THE SPIRIT of GOD WHO is GOD---and---repents/turns away from the wrongful thinking (and doing, explicitly and/or tacitly), thus aligning oneself with THE LORD GOD and HIS truth(s) aka being CHRIST-centered aka having a CHRISTian conscience---which is one of a number of evidences of a regenerated soul, a “good tree” as it were. Again, unless and until the conscience is convicted/pricked by THE HOLY SPIRIT and humble repentance results, we will continue to see the futile struggles of individuals like last/least/lostinline, egk, Guest newname, fourvetta/maximist/prijun, etc., kicking against the goads, which again and again and again, is….pitiful, and sad to witness, very sad indeed. CHRISTians continue to pray for these individuals and individuals like them who turn a blind eye to and refuse/reject the truth(s) of SOLA SCRIPTURA in its entirety thus rejecting THE AUTHOR HIMSELF....
  11. REPEAT: Still avoiding the real issues via impertinent rhetoric unworthy of the dignity of an answer---so typical of someone who "talks" the talk, but when actual application and effectiveness of said talk is tested---falls woefully short. A pity. As was the case with the certifiable fourvetta/maximist/prijun, the hope of continuing in intelligible productive dialogue with such an individual, grows dimmer and dimmer with each of the individual's consecutive posts. Sad, very sad.... And again, the scene always plays itself out---sooner or later one's "true colors" emerge----and last/least/lostinline is certainly no exception. One needs only to read the individual's posts to see the “real” person behind the “claims.” Example: Out of one side of the mouth: Out of the other side of the mouth: No decorum whatsoever, only "potty mouth" jargon---and most definitely, no substance. Sadly, last/least/lostinline has proven to be an individual whose [Pharisaic] P.R.O.J.E.C.T.I.O.N is clearly demonstrated in her posts, and which cannot help but identify her as = a vile pious Pharisee---one who “speaks” the name of THE LORD GOD, but whose “heart” is far from HIM. If it were not so, she would have no problem answering the two questions related to her claim---“.....because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul.” JESUS did not waste time nor energy on vile pious Pharisees (except to rebuke them), and anonymous will follow suit....
  12. The scene always plays itself out---sooner or later one's "true colors" emerge----and last/least/lostinline is certainly no exception. One needs only to read the individual's posts to see the “real” person behind the “claims.” Once again, like the flaming left-wing liberal Democrats who reject the truth [regarding DJT] no matter the evidence, last/least/lostinline continues to strut in line with that same partisan party which simply cannot come to grips with the fact that they are….losers. Sadly, last/least/lostinline has proven to be an individual whose [Pharisaic] P.R.O.J.E.C.T.I.O.N is clearly demonstrated in her posts, and which cannot help but identify her as = a vile pious Pharisee---one who “speaks” the name of THE LORD GOD, but whose “heart” is far from HIM. If it were not so, she would have no problem answering the two questions related to her claim---“.....because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul.” JESUS did not waste time nor energy on vile pious Pharisees (except to rebuke them), and anonymous will follow suit.
  13. Still avoiding the real issues via impertinent rhetoric unworthy of the dignity of an answer---so typical of someone who "talks" the talk, but when actual application and effectiveness of said talk is tested---falls woefully short. A pity. As was the case with the certifiable fourvetta/maximist/prijun, the hope of continuing in intelligible productive dialogue with such an individual, grows dimmer and dimmer with each of the individual's consecutive posts. Sad, very sad....
  14. REPEAT: QUESTION [to last/least/lostinline]: Since you seem smitten with homosexuality, LGBTQ, etc., as seen in your posts---what is your disposition concerning "molokan" homosexuals, and how do you treat them---as JESUS does or as Pharisees do? And pleeeeeeeeeeeease, do not keep with your profile of denial that there are no "molokan" homosexuals, Huck.... A simple answer will suffice. Thank you.
  15. As expected --- nothing but hot foul air --- and more excuses and avoidance in answering related questions to your claim: The below excuse BTW, is absolutely N/A in this situation: It is just another fabricated falsehood and distraction from answering the related questions to your above claim. However, if you insist on believing your own lies, that is your prerogative---but never let it be said that they weren't exposed for what they are---fabrications/falsehoods/lies/untruths. Once again, you've proven that your "talk" doesn't square with your "walk," grandma---you can make as many claims as there are corn fields in Iowa, but when it comes to brass tacks and the true test, your claims have proven to be---empty words. REPEAT: You are in need of prayer BIG TIME!
×