Jump to content

anonymous

Uber Member
  • Content count

    1,129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About anonymous

  • Rank
    Servant

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0
  1. “Creepy” doesn’t begin to describe last/least/lostinline’s obsession with anonymous’ identity. Unfortunately for her, like fourvetta/maximist/prigun, last/least/lostinline’s “wires are crossed,” and her wannabe “Sherlock Holmes’” investigatory skills obviously are a hindrance not a help, resembling more the bumbling boob, Inspector Clouseau, than those of a competent investigator. Whomever and wherever last/least/lostinline has/is acquiring her information regarding this anonymous, is off base as seen in her assertions: The disrespect for and breaking of forum rules demonstrated by last/least/lostinline is a telling reflection of her modus operandi in life per se---favoring the “rules are meant to be broken” mantra of lawbreakers/rebels. However, to put this matter to rest, and for the record: Neither was/is this anonymous a widow nor childless---this anonymous was/is married and the parent of three children, all with disabilities, two of whom are severely disabled. So last/least/lostinline can put her little soul and its obsession to rest---and focus on the messages, which is the format of this forum, and not the messenger's identity [with whom last/least/lostinline is obsessed]. But alas, like the Pharisees during JESUS' day, last/least/lostinline is not interested in hearing the truth [via the messages], and actually is doing on this forum to CHRISTians today what the Pharisees did to CHRIST JESUS during HIS day---couldn’t find fault with HIS words and works after many attempts to do so---then shifted to accusing HIM falsely. And why? Simply because HE spoke the truth [concerning their spiritual status] seen in one of many such scenarios: “They answered him, ‘Abraham is our father.’ JESUS said to them, ‘If you were Abraham's children, you would be doing the works Abraham did, but now you seek to kill ME, a MAN WHO has told you the truth that I heard from GOD. This is not what Abraham did. You are doing the works your father did.’ They said to HIM, ‘We were not born of sexual immorality. We have ONE FATHER---even GOD.’ JESUS said to them, ‘If GOD were your FATHER, you would love ME, for I came from GOD and I am here. I came not of MY own accord, but HE sent ME. Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear MY word. You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies. But because I tell the truth, you do not believe ME. Which one of you convicts ME of sin? If I tell the truth, why do you not believe ME? Whoever is of GOD hears the words of GOD. The reason why you do not hear them is that you are not of GOD.’” (John 8:39-47) With the above truthful SCRIPTURAL text in view, let us return to the two questions posed to last/least/lostinline regarding her claim---“….because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul.” If last/least/lostinline truly believes SOLA SCRIPTURA to be the inerrant, infallible word(s) of ALMIGHTY GOD, and if THE HOLY SPIRIT WHO is THE SPIRIT of TRUTH WHO is THE SPIRIT of CHRIST WHO is ALMIGHTY GOD WHO is THE AUTHOR of SOLA SCRIPTURA, actually indwells her heart and soul as she claims---and SOLA SCRIPTURA teaches that THE LORD GOD HIMSELF, THE AUTHOR of SOLA SCRIPTURA, shows no partiality (aka bias/prejudice), and partiality (aka bias/prejudice) is---sin: “So Peter opened his mouth and said: ‘Truly I understand that GOD shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears HIM and does what is right is acceptable to HIM.’” (Acts 10:34-35) “For GOD shows no partiality.” (Romans 2:11) “My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our LORD JESUS CHRIST, THE LORD of glory.” (James 2:1) “But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.” (James 2:9) ---last/least/lostinline, a self-proclaimed “….man (???) of Faith in Yahushua Hamashiach….,” should have no problem whatsoever in answering the two related questions in THE SPIRIT of CHRIST/THE SPIRIT of TRUTH (truthfully/full of truth)/THE HOLY SPIRIT WHOM she claims "....indwells my heart and soul....": 1) What does THE HOLY SPIRIT WHO is THE SPIRIT of CHRIST [JESUS]---in you (your heart and soul)---teach you concerning molokanism’s partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? 2) Does THE HOLY SPIRIT WHO is THE SPIRIT of CHRIST [JESUS]---in you (your heart and soul)---approve [of] molokanism’s partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? So what are your answers, last/least/lostinline? And why do you continue to ignore these questions? Again, the answers are a no-brainer for a bona fide CHRISTian indwelt by THE SPIRIT of CHRIST [JESUS] WHO is THE SPIRIT of TRUTH WHO is THE HOLY SPIRIT--- WHOM last/least/lostinline claims "....indwells my heart and soul." (BTW, there is no difference in believing JESUS’ words when HE spoke (orally) while here on Earth, and believing HIS words documented (written) in SOLA SCRIPTURA post HIS departure---HIS words are one and the same truth---oral and written. In fact/truth, the written words as recorded in SOLA SCRIPTURA, are the oral/spoken words of JESUS.) Speaking to the misperception of on-the-defensive molokans---the crux of the issue is NOT, repeat NOT, [religious/spiritual] community per se, which is a wonderful entity instituted and established by THE LORD GOD HIMSELF. The crux of the issue, whether it be with traditionalists (e.g., molokans, Amish, Mennonites, etc.) and/or cultic fringe groups (e.g., maximisti, Mormons, JWs, raelists, scientologists, etc.), is---denial/rejection of---[the] truth---THE LORD GOD’S truth(s)---period, the end. CHRISTians on this forum who formerly were members of the pseudo-Christian molokan religious community do NOT, repeat, do NOT have an issue with “community” per se---they do have an issue however, with community, especially the religious leadership, that embraces and practices anti-CHRISTian/anti-SCRIPTURAL/un-GODly beliefs such as those communities mentioned above to name a few. For bona fide CHRISTians, the issue has always been---rejection of THE LORD GOD’S truth(s)/word(s) thus rejection of THE LORD GOD HIMSELF. Such was the case from the very beginning, prior to JESUS’ coming, it was the case during HIS day, it is the case now, and it will be the case in the future until HE returns---because bottom line---the [especially, unregenerate] person just does NOT want to hear/know THE CREATOR’S truth(s) and humble himself before the mighty hand of THE LORD in repentance, but would much rather concoct/create/fabricate his own “truth,” and actually believe it (as was the case with humankind’s progenitors in the beginning, and the "old Adams" of today such as last/least/lostinline, et al)---which is nothing short of---idolatry: a figment of the mind; fantasy; a false conception or notion; fallacy. Unfortunately for them, the [molokan] mindset of individuals like last/least/lostinline will never, repeat never, see this unless and until the person accepts conviction of wrongful thinking (and doing, explicitly and/or tacitly) by THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH aka THE SPIRIT of CHRIST aka THE SPIRIT of GOD WHO is GOD---and---repents/turns away from the wrongful thinking (and doing, explicitly and/or tacitly), thus aligning oneself with THE LORD GOD and HIS truth(s) aka being CHRIST-centered aka having a CHRISTian conscience---which is one of a number of evidences of a regenerated soul, a “good tree” as it were. Again, unless and until the conscience is convicted/pricked by THE HOLY SPIRIT and humble repentance results, we will continue to see the futile struggles of individuals like last/least/lostinline, egk, Guest newname, fourvetta/maximist/prijun, etc., kicking against the goads, which again and again and again, is….pitiful, and sad to witness, very sad indeed. CHRISTians continue to pray for these individuals and individuals like them who turn a blind eye to and refuse/reject the truth(s) of SOLA SCRIPTURA in its entirety thus rejecting THE AUTHOR HIMSELF....
  2. REPEAT: Still avoiding the real issues via impertinent rhetoric unworthy of the dignity of an answer---so typical of someone who "talks" the talk, but when actual application and effectiveness of said talk is tested---falls woefully short. A pity. As was the case with the certifiable fourvetta/maximist/prijun, the hope of continuing in intelligible productive dialogue with such an individual, grows dimmer and dimmer with each of the individual's consecutive posts. Sad, very sad.... And again, the scene always plays itself out---sooner or later one's "true colors" emerge----and last/least/lostinline is certainly no exception. One needs only to read the individual's posts to see the “real” person behind the “claims.” Example: Out of one side of the mouth: Out of the other side of the mouth: No decorum whatsoever, only "potty mouth" jargon---and most definitely, no substance. Sadly, last/least/lostinline has proven to be an individual whose [Pharisaic] P.R.O.J.E.C.T.I.O.N is clearly demonstrated in her posts, and which cannot help but identify her as = a vile pious Pharisee---one who “speaks” the name of THE LORD GOD, but whose “heart” is far from HIM. If it were not so, she would have no problem answering the two questions related to her claim---“.....because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul.” JESUS did not waste time nor energy on vile pious Pharisees (except to rebuke them), and anonymous will follow suit....
  3. The scene always plays itself out---sooner or later one's "true colors" emerge----and last/least/lostinline is certainly no exception. One needs only to read the individual's posts to see the “real” person behind the “claims.” Once again, like the flaming left-wing liberal Democrats who reject the truth [regarding DJT] no matter the evidence, last/least/lostinline continues to strut in line with that same partisan party which simply cannot come to grips with the fact that they are….losers. Sadly, last/least/lostinline has proven to be an individual whose [Pharisaic] P.R.O.J.E.C.T.I.O.N is clearly demonstrated in her posts, and which cannot help but identify her as = a vile pious Pharisee---one who “speaks” the name of THE LORD GOD, but whose “heart” is far from HIM. If it were not so, she would have no problem answering the two questions related to her claim---“.....because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul.” JESUS did not waste time nor energy on vile pious Pharisees (except to rebuke them), and anonymous will follow suit.
  4. Still avoiding the real issues via impertinent rhetoric unworthy of the dignity of an answer---so typical of someone who "talks" the talk, but when actual application and effectiveness of said talk is tested---falls woefully short. A pity. As was the case with the certifiable fourvetta/maximist/prijun, the hope of continuing in intelligible productive dialogue with such an individual, grows dimmer and dimmer with each of the individual's consecutive posts. Sad, very sad....
  5. REPEAT: QUESTION [to last/least/lostinline]: Since you seem smitten with homosexuality, LGBTQ, etc., as seen in your posts---what is your disposition concerning "molokan" homosexuals, and how do you treat them---as JESUS does or as Pharisees do? And pleeeeeeeeeeeease, do not keep with your profile of denial that there are no "molokan" homosexuals, Huck.... A simple answer will suffice. Thank you.
  6. As expected --- nothing but hot foul air --- and more excuses and avoidance in answering related questions to your claim: The below excuse BTW, is absolutely N/A in this situation: It is just another fabricated falsehood and distraction from answering the related questions to your above claim. However, if you insist on believing your own lies, that is your prerogative---but never let it be said that they weren't exposed for what they are---fabrications/falsehoods/lies/untruths. Once again, you've proven that your "talk" doesn't square with your "walk," grandma---you can make as many claims as there are corn fields in Iowa, but when it comes to brass tacks and the true test, your claims have proven to be---empty words. REPEAT: You are in need of prayer BIG TIME!
  7. REMINDER: We haven’t overlooked or forgotten last/least/lostinline’s detraction and diversion tactics from the real issue, namely her claim--- ---and [her] obvious avoidance in answering the related questions--- What does THE HOLY SPIRIT---in you---teach you concerning molokanism’s partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? Does THE HOLY SPIRIT---in you---approve [of] molokanism’s partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? ---especially in light of the truth(s) of SOLA SCRIPTURA (which she claims to believe) concerning---partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice: “So Peter opened his mouth and said: ‘Truly I understand that GOD shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears HIM and does what is right is acceptable to HIM.’” (Acts 10:34-35) “For GOD shows no partiality.” (Romans 2:11) “My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our LORD JESUS CHRIST, THE LORD of glory.” (James 2:1) “But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.” (James 2:9) Well, what say you---"....a man (???) of Faith in Yahushua Hamashiach...."---? Make good on your claim/word(s)....
  8. QUESTION [to last/least/lostinline]: Since you seem smitten with homosexuality, LGBTQ, etc., as seen in your posts---what is your disposition concerning "molokan" homosexuals, and how do you treat them---as JESUS does or as Pharisees do? And pleeeeeeeeeeeease, do not keep with your profile of denial that there are no "molokan" homosexuals, Huck.... P.S. Oh, and par for her course, once again, last/least/lostinline failed to comprehend the point of anonymous' statement---"P.S. BTW, lastleastlostinline is more than welcome to attend the above described congregation (of which anonymous is a member) located anywhere on this planet---and who knows, just maybe in doing so, she may even encounter anonymous." The point is, there are such congregations in all parts of the world, including but not limited to last/least/lostinline's back yard---IF---she is courageous enough to attend.
  9. There is no such term as--- hand-ringing---in the English lexicon; it is phony and clearly one more fabrication in a cache of falsehoods, and definitely an error of usage by guess who? Correct---the one who has proven to be proficient in poor English (spelling, grammar, syntax, mishmashed and/or non-existent terminology) and too proud to admit/confess it, and when exposed as being in error, weaves a lame and ridiculous tale in attempts to conceal the error, preferring to live in a world of make-believe rather than facing reality/truth. Unless and until last/least/lostinline is willing to acknowledge her errors and correct them, she will continue to unwittingly embarrass herself as she has done from post one. (Maybe last/least/lostinline should consider asking one of her well educated offspring to assist her in composing her posts from hereon---???) Likewise, unless and until last/least/lostinline is willing to acknowledge her fake/false assumptions and groundless conclusions, she will continue to delude herself into believing her own lies and further debunking her claim of ".....because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul...."---because again, THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH never lies hence HE obviously is not the "inspiration" behind lastleastlostinline's false statements. (In fact/truth, the one who inspires falsehoods/lies/untruths is THE LORD GOD'S adversary, the master deceiver---thus it would be highly advisable that lastleastlostinline examine herself.) A pathetic case indeed--- REPEAT: The person needs prayer BIG TIME! P.S. last/least/lostinline's "potty mouth" jargon and so-called "humor," is so undignified and unbecoming of someone claiming to be "....a man (???) of Faith in Yahushua Hamashiach...." and only dishonors THE LORD GOD (WHOM last/least/lostinline claims to have faith in), and serves to discredit the individual doing so---and anonymous will no longer engage in dialogue with the person if that type of jargon continues.
  10. last/least/lostinline “jumping the gun” again: To begin, the term “hand-ringing" is misspelled---the correct spelling is “hand-wringing” (with a “w” as in wringing out clothes….). The truth of the matter is that anonymous did in fact address the Jussie Smollett reference of---credibility (or more accurately, the lack thereof) and its application to lastleastlostinline---which evidently either went over lastleastlostinline’s head (failure to comprehend) and/or her conscious decision to completely ignore the reference’s intent and point, but chose instead to focus on and fulfill her own P.R.O.J.E.C.T.I.O.N of homosexuality, which she brings up again in her statement: Relying on her own baseless careless conjecture, last/least/lostinline concludes with groundless innuendo regarding anonymous’ church affiliation: In other words, to last/least/lostinline’s reject-reality/truth mindset, she has already formulated what she believes is “truth” which in actuality/reality/truth, is her own self-fabricated so-called "truth"---because the truth of the matter is, she has no actual data/information, no facts regarding anonymous’ church affiliation on which to base and arrive at her obviously erroneous conclusions---nothing except her own unfounded (unsupported by facts/truth) conclusive assumptions seen in her most recent posts: To last/least/lostinline’s reject-reality/truth mindset, her own unfounded assumptions above are a foregone conclusion because she has already decided (conscious, volitional decision) that her own unfounded assumptions above are “truth,” but again, as we shall see in anonymous’ description concerning anonymous’ church affiliation, these assumptions are unequivocally---false---which again, as previously warned, puts last/least/lostinline in danger of bearing false witness, and further reveals, as stated previously, that her claim ".....because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul" is dubious at best and outright false at worst---because again, THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH never lies hence HE obviously is not the "inspiration" behind lastleastlostinline's false statements. (In fact/truth, the one who inspires falsehoods/lies/untruths is THE LORD GOD'S adversary, the master deceiver---thus it would be highly advisable that lastleastlostinline examine herself.) Another interesting feature to observe in last/least/lostinline’s most current posts above, is her reaction and posture toward a person living a sinful lifestyle (e.g., Jussie Smollett). For all her caustic accusatory remarks and endless tirades regarding “Pharisee, Pharisaic….,” she is totally incognizant that her above reaction and attitude toward a person living in sin, places her as a Pharisee in the crowd who desired to stone the woman caught in adultery during JESUS’ day. (Can we spell P.R.O.J.E.C.T.I.O.N, P.R.O.J.E.C.T.I.O.N, P.R.O.J.E.C.T.I.O.N....???) Knowing that JESUS is the---PERFECT EXEMPLAR, we need to ask---what was JESUS’ attitude and posture toward the woman who was caught in adultery? Did HE revile her? Did HE jump on the band wagon to stone her along with the scribes and Pharisees? Did HE condone her sin? Let’s see--- “Early in the morning he came again to the temple. All the people came to him, and he sat down and taught them. The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery, and placing her in the midst they said to HIM, ‘Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. Now in the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do YOU say?’ This they said to test HIM, that they might have some charge to bring against HIM. JESUS bent down and wrote with HIS finger on the ground. And as they continued to ask HIM, HE stood up and said to them, ‘Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.’ And once more HE bent down and wrote on the ground. But when they heard it, they went away one by one, beginning with the older ones, and JESUS was left alone with the woman standing before HIM. JESUS stood up and said to her, ‘Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?’ She said, ‘No one, LORD.’ And JESUS said, ‘Neither do I condemn you; go, and from now on sin no more.’” (John 8:2-11) In light of the truthful text, and in answer to the above questions prefacing the text: JESUS’ attitude and posture toward the woman who was sinning was...compassion[ate]. Did HE revile her? No. Did HE jump on the band wagon along with the scribes and Pharisees to stone her? No. By the same token, did HE condone her sin? No. The account reveals that the truth of the matter is---every individual in the crowd, without exception, which included the self-righteous pious scribes and Pharisees, were guilty of---sin---as guilty as the woman caught in adultery. The account also reveals that while JESUS forgave the woman, HE also exhorted her not to continue in [her] sin: “JESUS stood up and said to her, ‘Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?’ She said, ‘No one, LORD.’ And JESUS said, ‘Neither do I condemn you; go, and from now on sin no more.’” And that is because THE LORD GOD’S---grace---pardons, cleanses, preserves, strengthens, enlightens, quickens, and restores. In contrast to the isolated “chisti and dookhovni” molokan religious community, the CHRISTian congregation of which anonymous is a member, like its HEAD, JESUS, and in HIS SPIRIT, is compassionate toward and reaches out to people who are caught in satan’s snare and living a sinful lifestyle (remember that JESUS came into the world and died for---sinners---Mark 2:17; Luke 5:32)---and in their compassion for their fellow man who is also created in the IMAGE of THE LORD GOD, they provide SCRIPTURAL counseling, sharing THE GOOD NEWS of freedom from bondage to satan’s grip on their lives by acknowledging/admitting/confessing their sinful lifestyle, repenting (turning away---from the lifestyle), accepting (faithfully believing) JESUS and HIS saving grace and forgiveness of [their] sin(s) via HIS death on the cross, and receiving the infilling of HIS SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of CHRIST aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH aka THE SPIRIT of GOD aka THE HOLY SPIRIT into their hearts/minds---and trusting, in prayer, on HIS power in them to say NO to sin (and the sinful lifestyle they had been living). And once members of the household of faith, they are encouraged and welcomed to join in fellowship with JESUS’ body of believers---and---because THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of CHRIST aka THE SPIRIT of GOD WHO is LOVE lives in them, they are inspired [by HIM] to share THE LORD GOD’S gift of grace to others who are ensnared by satan and living in sin, by/through sharing THE GOOD NEWS of CHRIST JESUS with them. Sorry to disappoint lastleastlostinline, but much to her chagrin, the fact/truth of the matter is that the congregation of which anonymous is a member, while compassionate, strictly adheres to and practices SOLA SCRIPTURA’S teachings: RE: Women in the church “For GOD is not a GOD of confusion but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church.” (1 Corinthians 14:33-35) Although women may be gifted teachers and leaders, those gifts are not to be exercised over men in the services of the church. THE LORD GOD has ordained order in HIS creation that reflects HIS own nature, an order that must be reflected in HIS church, hence it is improper (aischros: shameful, disgraceful) for women to speak in church. (BTW, the congregation of which anonymous is a member, also believes in the sanctity of life thus is categorically opposed to abortion, and does not in any way give credence and/or support to Planned Parenthood, and speaks out against such anti/un-SCRIPTURAL beliefs and practices.) RE: Homosexuality “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22) “For although they knew GOD, they did not honor HIM as GOD or give thanks to HIM, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal GOD for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things. Therefore GOD gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about GOD for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than THE CREATOR, WHO is blessed forever! Amen. For this reason GOD gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge GOD, GOD gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.” (Romans 1:21-28) “Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, in accordance with THE GOSPEL of the glory of THE BLESSED GOD with which I have been entrusted.” (1 Timothy 1:8-11) “Now I want to remind you, although you once fully knew it, that JESUS, WHO saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe. And the angels who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling, HE has kept in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment of the great day—just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire. Yet in like manner these people also, relying on their dreams, defile the flesh, reject authority, and blaspheme the glorious ones.” (Jude 1:5-8) Obviously, according to SOLA SCRIPTURA, THE LORD GOD destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah (and the surrounding cities) whose inhabitants “…indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire…”---and, serving as an example, warns against that type of lifestyle and that those who persist in it, will face “…a punishment of eternal fire” on that great Day of judgment. (The above SCRIPTURAL passages are pointed out to individuals in a sexually immoral lifestyle, including homosexuality, during SCRIPTURAL counseling by the congregation of which anonymous is a member.) The congregation of which anonymous is a member, also accepts and believes worship as an act of offering sacrifice and praise to THE LORD GOD, the priority being---to worship HIM according to how HE commands/prescribes, not according to what may be acceptable and/or popular in a particular culture in a particular time (e.g., molokanism) ---and that central to worship is the proclamation of the word(s) of THE LORD GOD (aka THE HOLY SCRIPTURES) by way of SCRIPTURAL exposition guided and influenced by THE HOLY SPIRIT. This evangelical theology affirms the vital doctrines of: SOLA SCRIPTURA: THE HOLY SCRIPTURES is the sole written DIVINE revelation, the CHRISTian’s only infallible rule for faith and life, and alone can bind the conscience of believers absolutely. (Matthew 4:4; 2 Timothy 3:16) SOLA FIDE: Justification is by faith alone. By THE LORD GOD’S free gift of grace, the righteousness of CHRIST JESUS is imputed to [HIS] believers and followers by faith and is the sole ground of HIS acceptance of believers, by which sins are pardoned. (Romans 5:1; Galatians 2:16) SOLUS CHRISTUS: CHRIST JESUS is the only mediator through WHOSE work people are redeemed and saved. (John 14:6; John 3:16) SOLA GRATIA: Salvation is provided solely via the free gift of THE LORD GOD’S grace for those who believe in HIM. (Romans 2:4; Ephesians 2:8-10) SOLI DEO GLORIA: Salvation is of THE LORD GOD and has been accomplished by HIM, therefore to HIM alone belongs the glory. (Isaiah 42:8; Colossians 3:17) Implicit in SOLA SCRIPTURA is the belief that SOLA SCRIPTURA is the DIVINELY inspired, infallible, and inerrant word(s) of THE LORD GOD, the sole written revelation that governs the faith and practice of the CHRISTian community, and alone can convict and bind the conscience. Implicit in SOLA FIDE is reference to the doctrine of justification by faith alone whereby the believer is justified before THE LORD GOD by HIS free gift of grace (CHRIST JESUS) by which HE imputes the righteousness of CHRIST JESUS to the believer (Romans 5:18-19)---and that the sole ground of justification is the merit of CHRIST JESUS, imputed to all who put their trust in HIM. To be clear, although good works flow necessarily and immediately from all justified persons, these works are not the meritorious grounds of justification (Ephesians 2:8-10). The congregation of which anonymous is a member, also believes that the [universal] church aka the body of JESUS aka HIS one and only bride/wife, consists of all those individuals whom THE LORD GOD has/does/will save throughout the world---“…from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages…” as revealed in SOLA SCRIPTURA (Revelation 5:9; 7:9-10)---and welcomes them into HIS household of faith with rejoicing (Luke 15:4-24). The marks of the church in individual congregations are those defining characteristics of the body of CHRIST JESUS throughout history. These marks are, especially, the right preaching of THE LORD GOD’S word(s) and the faithful declaration of THE GOSPEL by/through and under the guidance, influence, and power of THE HOLY SPIRIT, the administration of baptism and THE LORD’S supper (as HE HIMSELF instructed), the discipline of its members, and its submission to CHRIST JESUS as THE ONE [and only] true and rightful HEAD. (1 Timothy 3:13; Matthew 28:19; 16:19; 1 Corinthians 11:24-26) JESUS’ exhortatory words remind us--- “I tell you, on the day of judgment people will give account for every careless word they speak, for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.” (Matthew 12:35-37) As was previously and strongly urged--- for her own spiritual health and welfare/well-being, it would be wise of lastleastlostinline to cease and desist in her baseless unfounded speculative assumptions teetering on the cusp of bearing false witness---to do so is to enter into a [spiritual] danger zone. P.S. BTW, lastleastlostinline is more than welcome to attend the above described congregation (of which anonymous is a member) located anywhere on this planet---and who knows, just maybe in doing so, she may even encounter anonymous.
  11. Sorry to say it again, but continuing to spew lies is definite evidence that THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH does not reside within the individual spewing the lies---because again, THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH never lies. A pathetic case indeed---last/least/lostinline's own words indict and condemn her--- REPEAT: The person needs prayer BIG TIME!
  12. Absolutely unbelievable---bald-faced lie upon bald-faced lie upon bald-faced lie without batting an eye (dhs, move over and make room....)---like left-wing liberal Dems and media who have nothing significant/worthwhile to say (or do) with respect to the President, and are spiraling out of control, oh, oh....last/leastinline has really lost it as well---a change in her moniker to lostinline is most definitely applicable. Shameless, shameless, shameless.... To reiterate--- The Jussie Smollett and last/least/lostinline cases are examples of how and why rumor mills originate, and demonstrate the unconscionable lengths to which rumor inciters will go in their rebellion/unwillingness to deal with reality/truth. Pathetic, absolutely pathetic….shame on both of them. And again, last/leastinline's (now last/least/lostinline's) deviation tactics from the real issue, namely her claim---".....because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul”---and her obvious avoidance in answering the related questions---1) What does THE HOLY SPIRIT---in you---teach you concerning molokanism’s partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? and---2) Does THE HOLY SPIRIT---in you---approve [of] molokanism’s partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? Yes or no?---have not been overlooked or forgotten. The answers are a no-brainer for bona fide CHRISTians indwelt by THE HOLY SPIRIT, especially in light of the truths of SOLA SCRIPTURA regarding the sin of partiality aka bias/prejudice---yet it appears last/leastinline has difficulty in providing the answers to the questions. P.S. Her bald-faced lies are exposing last/least/lostinline's claim---".....because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul”---as being dubious at best and outright false at worst---because THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH never lies. A pathetic case indeed (literally)---the person needs prayer BIG TIME!
  13. Isn’t it interesting that out of anonymous’ entire post--- ---but when put to the test--- What has THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH---in you---taught you concerning molokanism and its teaching of partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? Based on the truths of SOLA SCRIPTURA, does THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH---in you---approve molokanism’s teaching of partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice toward non-molokans? Yes or no? ---prove to be---empty: Sorry to say, but last/leastinline's credibility is proving to be as reliable as Jussie Smollett's. Sad, very sad.... P.S. You can delude yourself last/leastinline, but never THE HOLY SPIRIT. ---last/leastinline selects the following statement to address: Please note the subject of the statement: Of course, par for her course, last/leastinline’s rejection-of-reality/truth mindset disregarded the entire point of anonymous’ post concluded in the above statement---the issue being one of—credibility, or more accurately, the lack thereof. (Maybe last/leastinline would have comprehended the real issue and point (i.e., credibility) if anonymous referred to R. Kelly instead of Jussie Smollett???) Mind you---there were no innuendos, implications, or explicit verbiage whatsoever, none/zero, not even a thought---in anonymous’ statement related to Jussie Smollett’s---homosexuality. The issue is---credibility---NOT---homosexuality. But notice the first thing out of last/leastinline’s chute in response to anonymous’ point and the above conclusive statement: Not only is last/leastinline oblivious to her own---P.R.O.J.E.C.T.I.O.N---of homosexuality (which has nothing to do with Jussie Smollett’s unreliability and untrustworthiness as a credible individual (anonymous' point), which unreliability and untrustworthiness BTW, he himself inflicted upon himself with his alleged “attack by two white men shouting ‘This is MAGA country’”---proven to be false)---but she goes on to cast aspersions on anonymous in her insinuative remarks: In Jussie Smollett’s case, the obvious motive for his despicable false rumor-igniting hoax/scam, is---hatred for the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump. In last/leastinline’s case, the obvious motive for her calumnious false rumor-igniting innuendo, is---hatred for whomever (anonymous notwithstanding) holds last/leastinline to her claims/words, and/or exposes [via SOLA SCRIPTURA] her claims/words (and/or beliefs/practices) to be less than true/truth aka empty and/or anti/un-SCRIPTURAL thus false. The above two cases are examples of how and why rumor mills originate, and demonstrate the unconscionable lengths to which rumor inciters will go in their rebellion/unwillingness to deal with reality/truth. Pathetic, absolutely pathetic….shame on both of them. P.S. And no, last/leastinline's deviation tactics from the real issue, namely her claim---".....because Ruach HaKodesh indwells my heart and soul”---and her obvious avoidance in answering the related questions---1) What does THE HOLY SPIRIT---in you---teach you concerning molokanism’s partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? and---2) Does THE HOLY SPIRIT---in you---approve [of] molokanism’s partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? Yes or no?---have not been overlooked or forgotten. The answers are a no-brainer for bona fide CHRISTians indwelt by THE HOLY SPIRIT, especially in light of the truths of SOLA SCRIPTURA regarding the sin of partiality aka bias/prejudice---yet it appears last/leastinline has difficulty in providing the answers to the questions.
  14. Like the maximisti, never SCRIPTURALLY substantiated answers, only avoidance, denial, and deviation with senseless unintelligible useless rhetoric.....
  15. Claims, claims, claims---- ---but when put to the test--- What has THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH---in you---taught you concerning molokanism and its teaching of partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice against non-molokans? Based on the truths of SOLA SCRIPTURA, does THE HOLY SPIRIT aka THE SPIRIT of TRUTH---in you---approve molokanism’s teaching of partiality (sin) aka bias/prejudice toward non-molokans? Yes or no? ---prove to be---empty: Sorry to say, but last/leastinline's credibility is proving to be as reliable as Jussie Smollett's. Sad, very sad.... P.S. You can delude yourself last/leastinline, but never THE HOLY SPIRIT.
×