seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted January 31, 2010 FREDERICK C. CONYBEARE HONORARY FELLOW UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, OXFORD 1921 Here's a copy for your review russian_dissenters.pdf Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted January 31, 2010 From Page 8 The third group is the Khlysty or flagellants, of which the Skoptsy or self-emasculators are an offshoot, dated by Ivanovski at the middle of the XVIIth Century, though he admits their origin to be obscure and that some features of their teaching go back to remote antiquity, to paganism and old Christian heresies. They were never, like the Old ritualists, champions of externals, of the letter, nor like the Molokanye, of the human reason; but are mystics, that is creatures of irresponsible feeling, believing in the immediate relationship of man to God to the extent of accounting themselves Gods, Christs, Prophets, divinely born, soothsayers. These sects enshroud themselves in almost impenetrable secrecy, but in presence of strangers call themselves orthodox Christians. From page 255 The Molokani, since 1905 have issued a monthly at Tiflis called Dukhovnyi Khristianin or "Spiritual Christian." Interesting that since komar's (rudometkin's) influence they really began identifying with the khlyst teachings of mgr It appears 21st century molokanism IS NOT molokan but an offshoot known as "Spiritual Christians" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NAD923 0 Report post Posted February 1, 2010 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Most molokan churches have spiritual christian in thier titles. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 1, 2010 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Most molokan churches have spiritual christian in thier titles. You have not offered any historical documentation to support your opinion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
coffee 0 Report post Posted February 1, 2010 . 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Russian historians, 2 of them being specifically Mel'nikov and Ding'lshtedt, wrote about Makcim Komar, who changed his name to Rudometkin, in the period of 1830-1850. The theory about Petro Levonitch is pure wishful thinking, and another excuse that the Rudometkinites use to perpetuate the dishonesty about the legend of their "christ" and "king of spirits", to whom they sing praises and jump enthusiastically while exalting his name during church services, from songs that are in the Russian "pesnyik", which are in virtually every "Molokan" church here in America. . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Huh? Report post Posted February 1, 2010 . 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Russian historians, 2 of them being specifically Mel'nikov and Ding'lshtedt, wrote about Makcim Komar, who changed his name to Rudometkin, in the period of 1830-1850. The theory about Petro Levonitch is pure wishful thinking, and another excuse that the Rudometkinites use to perpetuate the dishonesty about the legend of their "christ" and "king of spirits", to whom they sing praises and jump enthusiastically while exalting his name during church services, from songs that are in the Russian "pesnyik", which are in virtually every "Molokan" church here in America. . Let's not forget the capitain emelian conspiracy theory either! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted February 1, 2010 Sorry for the clarity of the copy That's actually 1833 not 1883 making rudi approximately in his early 20 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Most molokan churches have spiritual christian in thier titles. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NAD923 0 Report post Posted February 1, 2010 Where did you find this(insert), its not in the "russian dissenters (?) Sorry for the clarity of the copy That's actually 1833 not 1883 making rudi approximately in his early 20 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Most molokan churches have spiritual christian in thier titles. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted February 2, 2010 You are correct... That can be found in Cyclopaedia of Biblical, theological, and ecclesiastical literature, Volume 2 http://books.google.com/books?id=DTErAAAAY...kin&f=false Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lastinline 0 Report post Posted April 20, 2010 'NAD923' date='Feb 1 2010, 01:01 AM' post='47308'] Most molokan churches have spiritual christian in thier titles. With this logic, you would fit right in at "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints." lastinline (no confusion here) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted May 7, 2010 To the top Please download and read for yourself Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lastinline 0 Report post Posted May 10, 2010 To the top Please download and read for yourself An eye-opening read! lastinline (with a very comfortable seat/view) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2012 Excerpt from Cyclopaedia of Biblical, theological, and ecclesiastical literature, Volume 2 spiritual "christians"? There certainly is a spirit but it's not of God By the way, according to this book, rudometkin IS komar AND nad IS wrong 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Most molokan churches have spiritual christian in thier titles. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guest_somebody_* Report post Posted February 6, 2012 Excerpt from Cyclopaedia of Biblical, theological, and ecclesiastical literature, Volume 2 spiritual "christians"? There certainly is a spirit but it's not of God By the way, according to this book, rudometkin IS komar AND nad IS wrong 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Most molokan churches have spiritual christian in thier titles. If this is 1883, which I cant really make out whether its 1833 or 1883 from the page... Then NAD is right, this individual was Petro Leontiv, a MGR impersonator post 1880. In either case, in 1833 Maxim was either a young man or child. In 1883 he did not exist, except in the form of Petro Leontiv. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted February 6, 2012 No confusion 1833 and NAD is still wrong regarding your "god" mgr Excerpt from Cyclopaedia of Biblical, theological, and ecclesiastical literature, Volume 2 spiritual "christians"? There certainly is a spirit but it's not of God By the way, according to this book, rudometkin IS komar AND nad IS wrong 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Most molokan churches have spiritual christian in thier titles. If this is 1883, which I cant really make out whether its 1833 or 1883 from the page... Then NAD is right, this individual was Petro Leontiv, a MGR impersonator post 1880. In either case, in 1833 Maxim was either a young man or child. In 1883 he did not exist, except in the form of Petro Leontiv. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guest_somebody_* Report post Posted February 7, 2012 No confusion 1833 and NAD is still wrong regarding your "god" mgr Excerpt from Cyclopaedia of Biblical, theological, and ecclesiastical literature, Volume 2 spiritual "christians"? There certainly is a spirit but it's not of God By the way, according to this book, rudometkin IS komar AND nad IS wrong 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Most molokan churches have spiritual christian in thier titles. If this is 1883, which I cant really make out whether its 1833 or 1883 from the page... Then NAD is right, this individual was Petro Leontiv, a MGR impersonator post 1880. In either case, in 1833 Maxim was either a young man or child. In 1883 he did not exist, except in the form of Petro Leontiv. Sorry, facts don't line up. Lukian Petrovich was the leader of the Jumpers until the early 1850's when he appointed Maxim as his successor. Before that Maxim was not known as King of Spirits. 1833 is to early, the Molokan's didn't even go near the Transcaucasian Mountains until at least the 1840s. . Maybe pray to your god Zeus for further clarification on this matter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 Where is your backup for these claims? Any documentation or just winging it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guest_somebody_* Report post Posted February 8, 2012 Where is your backup for these claims? Any documentation or just winging it? Oh plenty of documentation, just don't feel like giving it to you is all. Next time when you lie just find a source that lies the same lie as you. Just so you don't look as stupid. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted February 8, 2012 The historical record stands There are at least 4 sources that point to the facts yet you are going to ignore them That's up to you By the way, the "I have know stuff but not going to tell" is weak You're not fooling anyone (other than yourself) mgr was not of God and you, as one of his minions, follow suit Where is your backup for these claims? Any documentation or just winging it? Oh plenty of documentation, just don't feel like giving it to you is all. Next time when you lie just find a source that lies the same lie as you. Just so you don't look as stupid. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Wondering Report post Posted February 8, 2012 For some reason I can't view it...just see a white screen? FREDERICK C. CONYBEARE HONORARY FELLOW UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, OXFORD 1921 Here's a copy for your review russian_dissenters.pdf Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted February 8, 2012 hmmm... It takes a little time to download maybe a minute or two You'll also need adobe acrobat to read it For some reason I can't view it...just see a white screen? FREDERICK C. CONYBEARE HONORARY FELLOW UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, OXFORD 1921 Here's a copy for your review russian_dissenters.pdf Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted July 25, 2012 Looks like uncle bob is wrong regarding the assertion that "komar" was used to denote all rudometkins That's simply not true See attached Excerpt from Cyclopaedia of Biblical, theological, and ecclesiastical literature, Volume 2 spiritual "christians"? There certainly is a spirit but it's not of God By the way, according to this book, rudometkin IS komar AND nad IS wrong 1883? MGR was gone by then. "Komar" was not MGR but Petro Levonich (he was in prison with MGR) (50 percent of russian/armanian molokans believe to be MGR) Most molokan churches have spiritual christian in thier titles. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest uncle bob Report post Posted July 27, 2012 hi seeking 2 questions How old was MGR when he was sent to Trans caucus? Why did he go there? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest uncle bob Report post Posted July 28, 2012 hi seeking 2 questions How old was MGR when he was sent to Trans caucus? Why did he go there? Still waiting for an answer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeking_truth_1 0 Report post Posted July 28, 2012 Already did in another post Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites